Geology
Laboratory:
Predicting Eruptions:
Earthquakes
as Warning Signs
A still -- Volcano -- Life --
That flickered in the night --
When it was dark enough to do
Without erasing sight --
A quiet -- Earthquake Style --
Too subtle to suspect
By natures this side Naples --
The North cannot detect
The Solemn -- Torrid -- Symbol --
The lips that never lie --
Whose hissing Corals part -- and shut --
And Cities -- ooze away –
Emily Dckinson
Introduction
The
first warning that
In
Questions/procedure
1. Make a hypothesis .Which of the following kinds of data do you think might be best for making a prediction about an eruption? You may combine choices and add your own ideas.
a) The average number of earthquakes per
hour. (If all the
small ones – some which were detected only by a seismograph – are counted, this
number becomes quite large. For
example, on
b) The number of earthquakes greater than 4.0. (Maybe the number of stronger earthquakes which occurred during a given period is more important than the swarms of little ones. Although a 4.0 earthquake probably would not be felt unless the person were directly over it, this strength is still large enough to be significant.)
c) The magnitude of the strongest earthquakes. (Maybe the pattern of when the strongest earthquakes occurred is significant.)
d) The occurrence of harmonic tremors. (As these were detected only on certain days, maybe they could be used to tell when the magma was moving.)
Write your hypothesis below.
2. The
volcanologists who were studying
In this activity you will plot the
real data given in the table. If you
were a scientist studying
Table of Earthquake Data from
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Time period |
Ave. No, of earthquakes per hour |
No. of earth-quakes greater than 4.0 |
Largest earth-quake for the 3-day period |
Other events: E=Eruption; H=Harmonic tremors |
March 20,21,22 23,24,25 26,27,28 29,30,31 |
0+ ˝ 5 3 1/2 |
1 1 1 1 |
4.1 4.4 4.9 4.6 |
Quiet Quiet E. (first) E. and H. |
April 1,2,3 4,5,6 7,8,9 10,11,12, 13,14,15 16,17,18 19,20,21 22,23,24 25,26,27 28,29,30 |
2 ˝ 3 2 1 ˝ 1 ˝ 1 ˝ 2 1 ˝ 1 1 |
2 4 4 4 6 6 7 9 7 7 |
4.9 4.5 4.7 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.8 4.6 4.7 4.7 |
E. (large) H E. and H. E. and H. E. E. Quiet Bulge detected Quiet Quiet |
May 1,2,3 4,5,6 7,8,9 10,11,12 13,14,15 16,17 18 |
1 1 1 ˝ 1 1 ? |
6 7 9 10 8 3 ? |
4.7 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.4 5.1 |
Quiet Quiet E. and H. E. Quiet Quiet E. (major) |
3. Move to a computer workstation and start Microsoft Excel. In the spreadsheet, list the middle-most date (from the string of 3 days) from column 1 in the table above. Enter it by month and day in the following way: April 2 = 4/2, May 14 = 5/14, etc. Excel will automatically change the format (as you will see). In the second Excel column, enter the associated average number of earthquakes per hour (column #2). Continue entering data from columns 3 and 4 (do not enter data from column 5).
4. When all data has been entered, highlight the first two columns in Excel. Click the Chart Wizard icon from the menu bar (it looks like a bar graph). Continue as follows:
Step 1: Select line graph option. Click Next.
Step 2: Click Next.
Step 3. Click Titles tab, and enter titles for the graph and the axes; Click Legends, uncheck show legend box; click Next.
Step 4: Click Finish.
5. A graph will appear on your spreadsheet. Right click on the x-axis and click Format Axis. Select the Numbers tab. The date category should already be selected. From the type box, select a date style that does not include the year (which, as you know, is 1980.) click OK. Left click on the graph and then Print .
6. Repeat the steps above and create 2 additional graphs, one with data from column 3 and column 4. In each case, also highlight column 1 so that the dates appear on the graph. You can select non-adjacent columns by selecting one column, holding the ctrl key, then selecting the other.
7.
Study the graphs you have made to see if you can
detect a relationship between the earthquakes (the warning signs) and the
eruptions of
8. Explain why your chose the graph you did as the best predictor. Do the inclusion of eruptions and harmonic tremors reinforce your argument? How? Would the same information be able to predict other volcanic eruptions at other volcanoes? Defend your position.