Group Member Evaluation Rubric
	Evaluator:	Group member:
Working collaboratively requires that students develop and maintain positive and functional relationships with their group members.  Effort among members
should be nearly equal.  Individuals should not be “carried” by the remaining group members.  Grading must reflect the efforts of each individual.  Although
the instructor can monitor group interaction to some degree, much of the interaction takes place beyond the instructor’s ability to observe.   This allows group
members to offer their input.  This will be considered when assigning grades.  Be fair and reasonable. (30 points)
1.  Workload equity
Group member completed an	Group member contributed	Group member contributed	Group members contributions
equal share of work and	significantly, but other	little toward the project	were insignificant or
strived to maintain that equity	members clearly contributed		nonexistent
throughout the project	more
3	2	1	0
2.  Conflict resolution
Group member worked to	Group member was	Group member was	Group members generated
minimize conflict and was	minimally involved in	the source of conflict	regular conflicts which
effective at solving personal	solving conflicts	within the group	interfered with project
issues within the group			progress
3	2	1	0
3.  Assistance
Group member completed an	Group member contributed	Group member contributed	Group members contributions
equal share of work and	significantly, but other	little toward the project	were insignificant or
strived to maintain that equity	members clearly contributed		nonexistent
throughout the project	more
3	2	1	0
4.  Effectiveness
Work performed was	Participation was	Work performed was	Work performed was
very useful and contributed	inefficient and thus	inappropriate and mostly	completely ineffective and
significantly to the final	contributions were less	useless toward the final	useless in the final
product	than expected	product	product
3	2	1	0
5.  Dependability
Group member provided	Group member contributions	Group member contributions	Group member was
contributions with 100%	were mostly punctual	were regularly late	undependable forcing other
punctuality and always	and almost always appeared	and often missed scheduled	members to take up the
appeared for group work	for group work	group work	slack
3	2	1	0
6.  Leadership
Group member often took	Group member firmly	Group member occasionally	Group member exhibited no
a leadership role	supported the group and	rejected leadership without	leadership qualities and was
organizing others and	assisted in leading and	due cause and provided	an obstacle to effective
solving problems	directing	little leadership	leadership by others
3	2	1	0
7.  Quality
Group member's work	Group member's work	Group member's work	Group member's work
product was of	product was sometimes	product was frequently	was routinely of poor
extremely high quality	unpolished and/or	unpolished and/or	quality and lacked
	incomplete	incomplete	a sense of pride
3	2	1	0
8.  Ambition
Group member was	Group member regularly	Group member often seemed	Group member was regularly
extremely eager to plan and	exhibited a drive to	disinterested or	disinterested and
execute the project	complete the project	unmotivated	unmotivated
3	2	1	0
9.  Attitude
Group member was	Group member didn't	Group member sometimes	Group member often
very positive and	complain but offered	complained and was	complained and generally
pleasant to	little enthusiasm	somewhat of a	demoralized the group
work with		burden
3	2	1	0
10.  Relationship
This person was an	You would work with	You would prefer	You would never work
excellent partner, and	this person again but would	to never work in a	with this person again under
you would eagerly	choose someone else if	group setting with this	any circumstances
work with them again	given the opportunity	person again
3	2	1	0
Explanation / comments:			Total Points of 30