| Geography 120 Midterm Project |
|
|
|
|
|
| Peer Evaluation Rubric |
|
Evaluator: |
Project Group Members: |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| You
will use the following rubric will be used to assess your fellow classmates'
projects. A well done project should
be carefully and thoroughly researched, deeply |
|
| considered
and thoughtful, and presented with the intention to teach you. Take great care in considering your
assessment; be fair, accurate, and reasonable. |
|
| (40 points) |
|
|
| |
|
| 1. Research:
Landforms and Geology
-- Does the project demonstrate
thorough research and understanding in these areas? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Research is extensive |
Good research and |
Research and understanding |
Additional
research is |
Little to no |
|
|
| and a thorough |
a well
supported |
are at a the minimum level |
needed
to develop a |
research or understanding |
|
|
| understanding is evident |
understanding |
to establish arguments |
minimal understanding |
is evident |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 2. Research:
Climate and Water Resources -- Does the project demonstrate thorough
research and understanding in these areas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Research is extensive |
Good research and |
Research and understanding |
Additional
research is |
Little to no |
|
|
| and a thorough |
a well
supported |
are at a the minimum level |
needed
to develop a |
research or understanding |
|
|
| understanding is evident |
understanding |
to establish arguments |
minimal understanding |
is evident |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 3. Research:
Soils and Ecosystems -- Does the project demonstrate thorough
research and understanding in these areas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Research is extensive |
Good research and |
Research and understanding |
Additional
research is |
Little to no |
|
|
| and a thorough |
a well
supported |
are at a the minimum level |
needed
to develop a |
research or understanding |
|
|
| understanding is evident |
understanding |
to establish arguments |
minimal understanding |
is evident |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 4. Research:
Human Practices --
Does the project demonstrate thorough research and understanding in
these areas? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Research is extensive |
Good research and |
Research and understanding |
Additional
research is |
Little to no |
|
|
| and a thorough |
a well
supported |
are at a the minimum level |
needed
to develop a |
research or understanding |
|
|
| understanding is evident |
understanding |
to establish arguments |
minimal understanding |
is evident |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 5. Identification and Explanation of
Interrelationships: Completeness -- Are there an adequate number of interrelationships
established? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Numerous, broad |
Several interrelationships |
Number of |
Interrelationships |
No interrelationships |
|
|
| interrelationships |
are
present resulting in a |
interrelationships |
are |
were |
|
|
| are quite evident |
well rounded project |
is adequate |
minimal |
established |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 6.
Identification and Explanation of Interrelationships: Depth and Thoroughness -- Are interrelationships explained with enough detail so as to
be |
|
| convincing and legitimate? |
|
|
|
| Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
No interrelationships |
|
|
| are highly sophisticated |
are well established, |
are basic |
are brief |
were |
|
|
| and thorough |
convincing and legitimate |
but convincing |
and weak |
established |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 7. Identification and Explanation of
Interrelationships: Clarity
-- Are interrelationships clear and easily understood? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
Interrelationships |
No interrelationships |
|
|
| are clear, evident, |
are clear
and |
are fairly easy |
are vague |
were |
|
|
| and interwoven |
evident |
to understand |
and confusing |
established |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 8. Presentation Organization -- Were the display board and related presentation items organized
thoughtfully, attractively, and logically? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| All necessary information |
All necessary information |
Lacking in some information |
Lacking significant |
Sparse; |
|
|
| is present; excellent flow; |
is present; |
and/or somewhat |
information and/or |
disorganized; or |
|
|
| sophisticated and attractive |
excellent flow |
disorganized |
confusing |
no board |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 9. Graphics -- Were graphics such as maps, diagrams, graphs,
photos, art, etc. used to clearly communicate important information? |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Wide
variety of |
Some graphics were used; |
Few graphics were used; |
Few graphics were used; |
No |
|
|
| highly useful |
graphics
communicated |
graphics
communicated |
graphics
were not very |
graphics |
|
|
| graphics |
information well |
information well |
useful |
|
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| 10. Oral Presentation and Interaction -- Did group members verbally
explain important aspects of the project, check for understanding, and |
|
|
| appropriately respond to questions? |
|
|
|
| All group members spoke |
All group members spoke |
Most group members spoke |
Few group members were |
Little or no |
|
|
| Excellent explanations |
Good
explanations and |
Explanations were brief with |
involved; poor explanations |
speaking or |
|
|
| Strong interaction |
interactions |
some interaction |
little interaction |
interaction |
|
|
| 4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Explanation / comments: |
|
Total Points of 40 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|